Libertate 2023 720p.HDTV Magnet Link

29/11

I encourage people to watch this film

Synopsis

During the 1989 Romanian revolution, Sibiu witnesses a violent attack on a police station that escalates into armed clashes between soldiers, police, protesters, and secret police. References Rocky (1976). no matter how much I was angered by watching it. It is a compelling and, as previous posters (apparently mostly Romanian) have written, is truly an “immersive experience”; and it deserves to be seen and applauded artistically. But it is, unfortunately, a deeply regrettable parody from the point of view of someone who spent decades investigating the events of the Romanian Revolution of December 1989.

Most of what they said rang true, but something seemed to be missing, an element of intrigue that no one liked to mention

My first, of several, hopefully episodic, entries, is to demonstrate that, despite what Tudor Giurgiu, the director, has said in his numerous interviews and what a reviewer, Eugen Istodor, has said… "The voice of the Securitate (the communist-era secret police) has not been heard for over 30 years and this film gives them the answer."…there is nothing new in this story…in fact, it has been expressed repeatedly and has long achieved a hegemony in Romanian media and everyday life. (Tudor Giurgiu spoke publicly on these shows, I was there for one, about the "false narratives (about the Army) that have dominated for over 30 years… and about the supposedly dominant narrative of the "Glorious Army";…but let’s test his claims here)…below, for English speakers, two famous public discussions of Sibiu The Events of December 1989…from 1990 and 1997, so 33 years and 26 years respectively…to be continued…POET, ESSAYIST AND NPR COMMENTATOR ANDREI CODRESCU in Sibiu in July 1990, seven months after the Romanian Revolution of December 1989 While my friends were talking, a strange feeling came over me. Here, in the midst of this sumptuous celebration, I experienced the strangeness of another revelation (almost nine): Everyone blamed the army for the shootings; none of them blamed the Securitate.

Could my friends have been?

And yet the official government line was that the Securitate – not the army – had massacred all those people who had been massacred indisputably in Bucharest, Sibiu and elsewhere. I felt like jerking my shoulder (a sign he had mentioned earlier was used to communicate that someone had connections to the Securitate), but I had no one to do it to. In any case, the idea they were putting forward, and which was corroborated everywhere these days, was that many shots had been fired, but few in Ceaușescu’s defense. He had been betrayed by everyone. Not even his son, who had been in charge in Sibiu, had ordered anyone to shoot at the demonstrators.

Everyone was involved

Ironically, the People’s Army began firing into the crowd at the same time that the army was officially coming “on the side of the people.” However, the shooting was intended to create more panic than the bodies. Romania’s TV revolution had only one side… –"Big Chills: My High School Reunion in Romania," HARPER’S MAGAZINE, NOVEMBER 1990 and in 1997, the American novelist and Pulitzer Prize-winning William McPherson wrote about what Valentin Ceaușescu, the eldest son of communist dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu, told him about the events of the Romanian Revolution of December 1988. Here are . a few excerpts:Valentin and I were having coffee in the Vox Maris, the same large casino where the funeral feast was being held.

“But rumors do come true” –“Yes

It was morning, two days after the funeral (of Nicu Ceaușescu), and the crowds had not yet arrived.–"Nicu was never prepared to be the successor. That was (just) the rumor." He paused for a moment.